Beautiful.ai vs Gamma
A side-by-side look at pricing, free plans, platforms and features, for tools that both cover slides.
vs
| Feature |  Beautiful.ai |  Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free trial · from $14.50/month | Freemium |
| Free to start | Free trial only | Yes |
| Best for | Slides | Slides, Design |
| Who uses it | Consultants, Sales teams | Consultants, Teachers, Startups |
| Works on | Web | Web |
| About | Beautiful.ai applies design rules automatically as you add content, so slides stay aligned and on-brand, and its AI generates decks from a prompt. Teams share brand templates. | Gamma turns a prompt, outline or document into a designed presentation, document or simple website that you can edit like a doc. Consultants and founders use it for decks in minutes. |
Beautiful.ai vs Gamma: privacy and safety
From each vendor’s public policies, as scored by SafeScore.
| Beautiful.ai | Gamma | |
|---|---|---|
| SafeScore | Not rated yet | 81 |
| Trains on your data | Not rated yet | No (by default) |
| GDPR / DPA | Not rated yet | Yes |
| SOC 2 / ISO 27001 | Not rated yet | Yes |
| HIPAA BAA | Not rated yet | Not found |
| Data deletion | Not rated yet | Yes |
| SSO & admin controls | Not rated yet | Yes |
| Full report | — | Is Gamma safe? |
Which one should you pick?
Gamma lets you start for free, so it is the easier one to try first. Both are described from their official websites; try each with a real task from your own work before you commit, since quality depends heavily on the job.
Other tools to compare
Otter.aiVerified
82SafeScore 82/100StrongAI risk management score for Otter.aiData privacySecurity & complianceTransparencyAI governanceUser safeguardsHow SafeScore works AI meeting notes and transcription
