Clay vs Copy.ai
A side-by-side look at pricing, free plans, platforms and features, for tools that both cover sales.
vs
| Feature |  Clay |  Copy.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free trial | from $24/month |
| Free to start | Free trial only | No |
| Best for | Sales, Agents | Writing, Marketing, Sales |
| Who uses it | Marketers, Sales teams | Marketers, Sales teams |
| Works on | Web | Web, API |
| About | Clay pulls data from many providers into a spreadsheet-like workspace and uses AI agents to research companies and people, so teams can build targeted lead lists and personalised messages. | Copy.ai turns repetitive go-to-market writing into automated workflows: prospect research, outreach emails, product descriptions and content briefs. Teams build a workflow once and run it on lists of leads or products, with a free plan to start. |
Clay vs Copy.ai: privacy and safety
From each vendor’s public policies, as scored by SafeScore.
| Clay | Copy.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| SafeScore | Not rated yet | 82 |
| Trains on your data | Not rated yet | No (by default) |
| GDPR / DPA | Not rated yet | Yes |
| SOC 2 / ISO 27001 | Not rated yet | Yes |
| HIPAA BAA | Not rated yet | Not found |
| Data deletion | Not rated yet | Yes |
| SSO & admin controls | Not rated yet | Yes |
| Full report | — | Is Copy.ai safe? |
Which one should you pick?
Copy.ai also runs on API. Both are described from their official websites; try each with a real task from your own work before you commit, since quality depends heavily on the job.
Other tools to compare
ZapierVerified
94SafeScore 94/100StrongAI risk management score for ZapierData privacySecurity & complianceTransparencyAI governanceUser safeguardsHow SafeScore works Automate work across thousands of apps
