Cursor vs Lovable
A side-by-side look at pricing, free plans, platforms and features, for tools that both cover coding.
vs
| Feature |  Cursor |  Lovable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan · from $8/month | Freemium |
| Free to start | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Coding | Coding, Design |
| Who uses it | Developers, Startups | Designers, Startups, Product managers |
| Works on | Web, API, Slack, Windows, macOS | Web |
| About | Cursor is a code editor built around AI: it predicts your next edit, answers questions about the whole codebase and runs agents that make multi-file changes you review. It is based on VS Code, so extensions and settings carry over. | Lovable builds working web applications from a conversation: describe the app, and it writes the front end and back end, connects a database and lets you refine by asking for changes. Founders use it for prototypes and MVPs. |
Cursor vs Lovable: privacy and safety
From each vendor’s public policies, as scored by SafeScore.
| Cursor | Lovable | |
|---|---|---|
| SafeScore | 84 | 85 |
| Trains on your data | No (by default) | Depends on plan |
| GDPR / DPA | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 / ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes |
| HIPAA BAA | Not found | Not found |
| Data deletion | Yes | Yes |
| SSO & admin controls | Yes | Yes |
| Full report | Is Cursor safe? | Is Lovable safe? |
Which one should you pick?
Cursor also runs on API, Slack, Windows. Both are described from their official websites; try each with a real task from your own work before you commit, since quality depends heavily on the job.
Other tools to compare
ReplitVerified
85SafeScore 85/100StrongAI risk management score for ReplitData privacySecurity & complianceTransparencyAI governanceUser safeguardsHow SafeScore works Build and deploy apps with an AI agent
